Category Archives: My musings

My Column Is Heading to CNET!

Dear friends, colleagues and supporters,

I’m thrilled to announce that I’m joining CNET and CBS Interactive as a contributing columnist and commentator!

Ever since my departure from Mashable, I’ve posted my personal take on the big technology news of the day on BenParr.com. The response to my work has been overwhelming, and traffic to this blog has skyrocketed. Thank you all for reading, commenting and sharing.

But now I have a chance to make a much bigger impact with my writing. Starting this week, my commentary on technology, social media and startups will appear on CNET several times per week. I will not be doing any straight reporting — CNET has a talented team that already does an amazing job at that. Instead, I will be doing what I’ve been doing here on BenParr.com: breaking down the big issues and players in tech and explaining what it actually means for both the tech industry and society as a whole.

To do that, I will be writing a combination of thought pieces, analysis stories, response pieces and the occasional long-form column. My CNET column is called The Social Analyst, just like my column on Mashable. It’s going to have more bite than my old column, though. I intend to keep tech’s biggest names honest.

I decided to join forces with CNET/CBSi because CBS Interactive CEO Jim Lanzone and CNET General Manager Mark Larkin have an ambitious vision for the future.

CNET is huge: it is one of the 100 most visited websites in the world, but Mark and Jim are not content with resting on their laurels. I believe in their vision and their leadership, and I am thrilled to be working with them.

CNET isn’t my only gig, though. For the last few months, I’ve also been working behind-the-scenes on a startup, which we can’t wait to talk more about! My co-founder and I have a clear vision, as well as a duty to our investors, and we will move heaven and earth (and forgo sleep) to make sure our company succeeds.

My new role at CNET and CBSi is the best of both worlds. I get to reach millions of people with my thoughts on technology, but still retain the flexibility to be an entrepreneur, build amazing products and change the world.

Don’t take your eyes off of CNET. Big things are happening over there, and you won’t want to miss all the action. 2012 is going to be an amazing year.

Cheers,
~ Ben

The Art of the Introduction: A Primer

I make 12-18 introductions per week on average. Some of the intros I make are favors to friends, some of them are to journalists, some are for the startups I advise, and some were because I thought that two people just needed to meet each other.

Most of the time, the introductions I see people make are terse with little context and even less reason for both sides to follow up. The conversion rate for these types of introductions is poor.

This doesn’t have to be the case for your introductions, though.

Introductions are as much an art as they are a science. Making a few changes to your intros will not only dramatically increase their quality, but it will improve your standing with both parties. In other words, you’ll become a far better Connector.


The Anatomy of a Great Introduction


I follow a structure when I make intros — I don’t reinvent the wheel every time. This means I can get a GOOD intro out the door in under two minutes.

Consistency is important — it gives your intros more continuity.

Below are the four key structure points of my introductions. I’m using John Smith of Kleiner Perkins and Jane Doe of Google as examples for this introduction so you get a better idea of my style of intros. Of course, my method may not be for you — definitely adjust your system to match your personality and the personality of the people you’re introducing.

Here are my four key structure points for introductions:

  • The Subject Line: The subject line of any email introduction should be simple and straightforward. It should convey two things: who the people being introduced are and what they do. The person who is receiving the introduction should be first in the subject, while the person being introduced should be second. “John Smith (Kleiner Perkins), Meet Jane Doe (Google)” is a typical subject line for my introduction.
  • First Intro: Make the first introduction and explain, in three sentences or so, who this person is, why you like them and why you’re making this introduction. I also usually say something fun or interesting about the person. In my example, I’m going to address John Smith first and introduce him to Jane Doe.
  • Second Intro: Great introductions actually consists of two separate introductions. I always flip the introduction and explain who the other person is and why I like them. In this case, I’m going to address Jane Doe and introduce him to John Smith. Typically the second intro is shorter because Jane already knows John and, in all likelihood, asked me for the introduction.
  • The Loop out: Unless you need both parties to report back to you, it’s best if you get out of the conversation. Thus a simple “Feel free to loop me out” sentence helps remove unnecessary clutter from your inbox.

Now let’s apply this to an actual introduction. Here’s what an introduction between John and Jane might look like:

SUBJECT: John Smith (Kleiner Perkins), Meet Jane Doe (Google).

John,

I’d like to introduce you to Jane Doe. She’s one of the super-talented product managers over at Google — she’s been kicking some ass over on the Chrome team. She’s also a master scuba diver (I’ve done a bunch of dives with her!) Jane is actually working on a startup, and I knew that the two of you had to connect.

Jane,

John is one the partners at Kleiner Perkins. He’s led some awesome investments in Google, Zaarly, Erly and Flipboard. He’s been my sounding board over the years for my crazy startup ideas.

Feel free to BCC me/loop me out.

Cheers,
~ Ben


Final Thoughts


The more introductions you make, the better you will get at making them. Don’t be afraid to make introductions if you think both sides will gain something out of it. It ends up being a benefit to you, too, as you become a greater connecter and gain credibility on both sides of the table. The positive karma you create by connecting two smart people often comes back in wonderful and unexpected ways.

Don’t make an introduction if you’re uncomfortable, though. If you think someone is not ready, or if you think the intro will do more harm than good, just tell the truth to the person asking for the introduction. Never be afraid to protect your reputation.

I hope this quick primer has been helpful, even if much of it is common sense. Please post in the comments if you have any other tips or thoughts on the art of the introduction!

The Rise of the Smart Assistant

Almost everybody wants to have an assistant, even if people won’t freely admit it. Who doesn’t want an extra set of hands to help out with chores, scheduling, reminders, meetings, reservations, and the myriad of other tasks that we need to complete every single day?

Just a few years ago, the only way you could get yourself an assistant was to pay one a full-time salary. Very few people can afford the luxury having somebody help them with all of the tasks and information in their lives. But that has rapidly changed with new technology that makes it easier to outsource our lives.

This is what I call “Smart Assistant” technology, and I group it into three distinct buckets:

  1. Technological Assistants: The best known of these is Apple’s Siri, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Evi, for example, is far better at searching for relevant information on-the-fly.
  2. Virtual Assistants: Virtual assistants have been around for a while, but now they’re far more affordable thanks to services like Zirtual (which I use and love) and FancyHands. Rather than paying somebody $50K a year, you can pay $50 to $200 a month and get almost all the same benefits.
  3. Task Outsourcing: I’m a huge fan of services like Taskrabbit and Zaarly, which lets you outsource chores like food delivery, IKEA furniture assembly, laundry and grocery shopping. The convenience is worth the price.

While each bucket is vastly different, they help accomplish the same things — they help people save time, and they help put people’s minds at ease.

We’re only at the beginning of this phenomenon though. I believe it’s especially true for technological assistants, which are in the best position to deal with (but have yet to solve) one of the biggest problems of the Internet age: cognitive and information overload.

Smart assistants are huge businesses. Five years from now, you’re going to wonder how you lived without them.

Siri image courtesy of Flickr, Kaptain Kobold

Likes, Retweets, Comments & the Rise of the Validation Society


Not too long ago, my co-founder and I were deep in investor prep and product design (announcements coming soon) when we started talking about the emotional appeal and “stickiness” of our product. When you’re building a consumer-oriented product, creating an emotional connection with the user is central to success.

We were fascinated by the fantastic Plancast post-mortem by founder Mark Hendrickson. While the entire thing is worth a read, this is the paragraph that stuck out to me:

“Most social networks feed primarily on vanity, in that they allow people to share and tailor online content that makes them look good. They can help people communicate to others that they’ve attended impressive schools, built amazing careers, attended cool parties, dated attractive people, thought deep thoughts, or reared cute kids. The top-level goal for most people is to convince others they are the individuals they want to be, whether that includes being happy, attractive, smart, fun or anything else.”

Hendrickson nails it. Social networks cater to our emotional desire need for validation. It’s why, as my follows argue, that we strive to get As on our report cards, go to church or value trophies so highly.

I argue that modern society’s emphasis on validation has skyrocketed though, thanks to the rise of social media. We have entered the Age of the Validation Society.

Why do post photos on Facebook? Why do you tweet? Why do you check out your Klout score, even though you claim you never check it? The answer is simple: we get an emotional high every time somebody likes, retweets or comments on the things we post.


We always want another hit. Validation is the crack, Internet is the crack pipe and Facebook & Twitter are the dealers. Yes, I just compared Facebook and Twitter to drug dealers.

You can argue that you post on Facebook to keep your family up-to-date about your life. You can argue that you tweet to build up your personal brand. But in the end, you’re just like every other person on a planet: you love it when people start sharing one of your blog posts like mad, and you’re disappointed when nobody comments on that witty thing you just posted to your friends.

Whether the rise of the Validation Society is a good thing… I don’t know. But it’s real, and great consumer products need to keep this trend in mind. It’s something my co-founder and I are going to have to nail if we’re going to succeed as startup founders.

Additional thought: One of my followers raised a good point: validation is more valued in America than it is in most other cultures. Or perhaps it’s a different type of validation. I’d be curious to hear why the Japanese love Twitter so much, or why Facebook is HUGE in Indonesia.

Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time + Minecraft = Awesome [Video]

A group of people decided that they wanted to recreate Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time in Minecraft. It’s called Hyrulecraft, and the results are simply spectacular.

They redid everything: Hyrule, dungeons, all the little towns… everything but Gannon himself. They’re working on adding NPCs, quests and game mechanics, though.

Excuse me, I’m going to fire up Minecraft now. If you want to try it out, it’s sever 64.79.106.218.

Image courtesy of Hyrulecraft

SOPA Is Dead!

From Mashable:

Lamar Smith, the chief sponsor of SOPA, said on Friday that he is pulling the bill “until there is wider agreement on a solution.”

“I have heard from the critics and I take seriously their concerns regarding proposed legislation to address the problem of online piracy,” Smith (R-Texas) said. “It is clear that we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products.”

Congrats, everyone. Now it’s time for the hard job of crafting new legislation that stops piracy while protecting the integrity and freedom of the Internet.

The Google+ Antitrust Disaster

Google has become the tech media’s punching bag today, thanks to its launch of deep Google+ integration in Google Search.

The move was something that I expected, but I don’t think anybody expected the integration to be so massive. You can’t browse Google without seeing Google+ everywhere.

The problem is simple: Google is using its monopoly in search to direct people to its social network. Lots of people are comparing it to when Microsoft used Windows to boost Internet Explorer, effectively killing Netscape.

I don’t think all of the parallels are there — it’s far easier to switch search engines than switch operating systems. However, the question is valid: has Google abused its monopoly to thwart its competitors in social networking?

Google was clearly unprepared for the backlash. Eric Schmidt’s odd interview with Danny Sullivan makes it clear that Google hasn’t prepared a real defense against the antitrust allegations.

This is something the government is going to investigate. I wouldn’t want to be Google’s legal department right now.

Image courtesy of Flickr, Kainr

Google Search Gets Personal; Should Facebook Be Scared?

Google has launched three new features that personalize its search engine in a radical way. It’s the biggest change to Google’s search engine since Google Instant.

Google has fused Google Search with Google+ and Picasa to make results unique to the individualized. Clicking the person icon on the top right of the search page brings up these results.

Say you’re researching for a trip to Thailand. Normally Google will serve you relevant web pages about the area of Thailand you are researching. However, if you click the person icon (Google calls it the “Search plus your world” icon), it will start bringing up Google+ posts about Thailand from your network, related photos from your friends, and pages/profiles related to that query.

The changes also apply to searches for individuals. If I’m in your Circles, and you start typing my name, my profile will pop up. But the updated search engine will also pull up “prominent people on Google+”. This includes anybody who is a member of Google’s authorship program.

Essentially, Google has merged its search engine with Google+ and Picasa search. If you’re prominently using Google+, you’re going to show up more often in search results, and that is a very powerful thing.


Should Facebook Be Scared?


Google has decided that, if it is to beat Facebook, it needed to use its most powerful weapon: its search engine. We knew this was Google’s plan all along, but Google really went all-in on this one.

Will this take users away from Facebook though? I doubt it; there’s very little Google can do to beat Facebook’s entrenched network effect. Facebook is the repository and scrapbook for your entire life; Google+ simply isn’t as ubiquitous or useful. More people will sign up for Google+ and maybe even occasionally use it because they saw their friends appear in search results, but it won’t pry them away from Facebook.

What this does, though, is set up Google+ as the alternative to Facebook, should the social network eventually shoot itself in the foot. If Facebook stumbles badly, Google is in the prime position to seize on the opportunity and siphon away users.

Facebook’s real enemy isn’t Google; it’s Facebook. Google knows this, which is why the search giant is preparing for a massive user raid if and when Facebook slips up.

Money Doesn’t Matter. Time Does.


Money can be earned
Time can only be spent once
Be wise with your time

To a happy and prosperous 2012.


Image courtesy of Flickr, bethan

January 18: Let’s Stop SOPA By Focusing Our Efforts on Congress

In the last two days, a tidal wave of SOPA opponents have come out of the woodwork and found their targets: the companies officially supporting the act.

Ever since Congress released a list of corporations supporting the legislation, the Internet has been in a frenzy. GoDaddy has taken the brunt of the criticism. It started with ICanHazCheeseburger’s Ben Huh declaring that they would transfer their domains from GoDaddy if it didn’t withdraw its support of SOPA, but hundreds — if not thousands — of people are now transferring their domains (update: GoDaddy has withdrawn its support of SOPA).

That’s not all. Y Combinator will no longer allow SOPA-supporting companies to attend YC Demo Day (say goodbye to Comcast Ventures) and thousands of people are attacking the long list of companies supporting SOPA.

Focusing our attention on these companies is a waste a time, though. We are wasting our precious energy and resources on these corporations when we really should be doubling down our efforts on getting people to call, email and snail mail their Congressman.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (and its sister Senate legislation PIPA) have good intentions, but it is a flawed bill that inadvertently goes against the foundations of an open and free Internet. (The Verge has a great summary of SOPA if you are not up-to-speed.)

There are far better ways to fight piracy than SOPA.

Our goal is simple: to stop SOPA and PIPA from reaching the President’s desk. To that end, let’s put some real pressure on the congressional leaders trying to push this bill through.

You may think that contacting your Congressman doesn’t work, but trust me: it does. I used to work for the House of Representatives. I know first-hand what impact jamming the phone lines has on a Congressman looking to get re-elected.


So here is my proposal:


On Wednesday, January 18, when Congress is back in session, we the people shall send a massive wave of emails, phone calls and letters to the following people:

  • Your local House representative. You can find the phone number and website for your representative here.
  • The 31 cosponsors of SOPA. The bill will die if they back down. Here is the full list of cosponsors of the bill.

Clog their phone lines. Fill their inboxes. Make your voices heard.

We are setting up a website now to facilitate this effort and drum up much-needed attention against this bill. We need your help, though. Please send an email to me at ben[at]benparr[dot]com if you want to volunteer to help run the site.

Together, we can stop SOPA. Together, we can protect free speech and the open web.

~ Ben

Image courtesy of Law Blog Law